| CPA Mining 
              Campaign Thrust The Cordillera Region remains a major 
              target of local and multinational mining companies for the extraction 
              of its rich mineral resources, mainly gold and copper. Sixty-four 
              Applications for Production Sharing Agreement (APSA) covering 86,033.3575 
              hectares, and ten Application for Financial or Technical Assistance 
              Agreement (AFTA) covering 879,886.95 hectares, Exploration Permit 
              Applications (EXPAs) with 283,285.7237 
              hectares, and 5 industrial permit (IP) applications with 55.07 hectares 
              are being processed by the Mines and Geosciences Bureau in the Cordillera 
              region. Thus, all pending mining applications cover a total 
              land area of 1,234.005 hectares. Nine APSAs 
              covering 21,054 hectares, four EXPAs covering 11,067.587 hectares 
              and 4 industrial permit have been approved in the region. These 
              are in addition to the ongoing mining operations of Lepanto 
              Consolidated Mining Corporation and Philex 
              Mining Company. The processing of large mining applications has 
              been proceeding very slowly in our region as well as nationally. 
              Large-scale mining has not been able to attract as much foreign 
              investment as the government had hoped it would since the term of 
              President Ramos. Both the government and the Philippine Chamber 
              of Mines blame the situation on people’s protest, and on certain 
              provisions of laws that the people have used to protect their resources 
              and  defend 
              their rights against large mining.  Thus, the government and the Chamber of Mines have 
              embarked on a campaign to: • improve the image of large mining in the 
              country and neutralize the protest against it, or at least discredit 
              this protest;  • get rid of the legal impediments to faster 
              expansion and intensification of the industry. In their image-building efforts, however, government 
              and the Chamber of Mines have found it difficult to contend with 
              the continuing spread of information regarding the adverse impact 
              of large mining, as illustrated by both (a) stories that have recently 
              come out in the mass media on the persistence of the problems that 
              were generated by the massive spillage of tailings into Marinduque’s 
              Boac river from 1995 to 1996; (b) the data regarding the 
              damage that Lepanto has continually been 
              inflicting on the Abra river valley and 
              watershed since the company started operating in 1936.  In addition are news stories that have appeared 
              from time to time associating the exploration, start-up, or operation 
              of large mines with military and para-military 
              violence inflicted on protesting communities. 
              These include the continuing plight of workers in what is supposedly 
              the country’s highest-paying mining company, Lepanto. Globally, the mining industry has been striving 
              to improve its image because, worldwide, it has been meeting up 
              with resistance from communities occupying mineral-rich areas and 
              because its bad record has been driving away potential as well as 
              existing stockholders. Stockholders either have become too worried 
              about the future of their investments or have been successfully 
              reached by a growing First World movement 
              for what civil society believers call moral investment. The global industry campaign started a few years 
              back. Its aim is to significantly influence public opinion that 
              large mining can be socially responsible and environmentally sustainable. 
              This rhetoric has then shaped the draft 
              National Minerals Policy (NMP) mainly influenced by chamber of mines 
              of foreign countries leading the drive 
              for liberalization of national mining industries. However, the NMP, as formulated in December 2002, 
              is not just an image-building instrument. It also 
              aims to harmonize Philippine natural resource laws in favor 
              of the Mining Act of 1995. Its authors hope to do away with legal 
              requirements on large mining development, which are provided for 
              in other laws – specifically, the provisions on  Free 
              and Prior Informed Consent (FPIC)  in 
              the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA); the provisions 
              on ancestral land and ancestral domain in both the IPRA and the 
              National Integrated Protected Areas System or NIPAS Act; the provisions 
              for environmental protection in the Forestry Code, the Fisheries 
              Code, and the Environmental Impact Assessment System; and provisions 
              on both environmental protection and community consent in the Local 
              Government Code.  With the broad nationwide campaign to scrap the 
              Philippine Mining Act of 1995 (Republic Act 7942) for almost a decade 
              now and the persistent protests against the NMP, President Gloria 
              Macapagal Arroyo was frustrated in her 
              plan to sign the policy before 2003 ends. After almost a decade 
              of a broad nationwide campaign to scrap the Mining Act of 1995 and 
              the filing of a petition on the unconstitutionality of the said 
              law, the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional some of its 
              major provisions on January 29, 2004. It ruled as unconstitutional 
              and void the main instrument of foreign capitalist access to large 
              mineral deposits in the Philippines 
              – the Financial or Technical Assistance Agreement 
              (FTAA), which allows 100 % ownership, operation and management 
              of mining activities under this form of agreement.   The Cordillera Peoples Alliance (CPA), concerned 
              national and regional organizations, institutions and advocates 
              welcomed the SC decision and commended the SC justices who gave 
              consideration on the merit of the petition. The SC ruling already 
              put into question the constitutionality of the whole Mining Act. 
              This was partly a victory in our quest for indigenous peoples’ 
              rights, national sovereignty, social justice and environment protection. 
               But by limiting its decision to the matter of FTAAs 
              and by not junking the whole law as unconstitutional, the SC left 
              a loophole open to foreign exploiters by entering into partnership 
              with Filipino companies and still be able to do their joint 
               quest for profit through large scale 
              mining operations under the Mineral Production Sharing Agreement 
              (MPSA). This kind of partnerships can be seen in the Philex-Anglo 
              American cooperation and in 
              the Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company's 
              links with Rio Tinto executives. Against this backdrop, CPA remains committed to 
              pursue and heighten its campaign against large-scale mining to uphold  the rights and livelihood of affected 
              communities, the protection of the environment, and for sustainable 
              use of the people's resources for their own development and progress. 
               CPA shall continue to strengthen 
              the capacity and vigilance of affected communities and heighten 
              its information and awareness, advocacy and lobby work at the national 
              and international levels. This campaign hopes to prevent additional 
              mining operations in the region, while sustaining protests and other 
              activities to stop the expansion of Lepanto 
              Mining, gain compensation of affected communities and rehabilitation 
              of mined out areas and polluted rivers such as the Agno 
              river and the Abra river by  
              toxic mine tailings. # |